-
Bug
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
P3
-
9
-
b10
Really appreciate the updated build documentation for JDK9.
But the "Building on arm/aarch64" is misleading if not prejudicial:
<quote>
This is not recommended. Instead, see the section on Cross-compiling.
</quote>
Aarch64 can do full clean builds on spinning disks in 8 minutes or less. A rebuild (eg. nothing to make) takes about 4 seconds.
Of course this is on a commercially available workstation/server class machine, not a Rpi or hacked smart phone.
An 8 core/8GB virtualized slice of a machine takes about 30 minutes to do a full clean build. Not as pleasant, but usable.
I'm not sure what timings were considered acceptable for the other platforms (has anyone times a 4 core/ 4GB SPARC build recently?). But I'd suggest that the 8 core/8 GB config would be a useful suggested minimum.
But the "Building on arm/aarch64" is misleading if not prejudicial:
<quote>
This is not recommended. Instead, see the section on Cross-compiling.
</quote>
Aarch64 can do full clean builds on spinning disks in 8 minutes or less. A rebuild (eg. nothing to make) takes about 4 seconds.
Of course this is on a commercially available workstation/server class machine, not a Rpi or hacked smart phone.
An 8 core/8GB virtualized slice of a machine takes about 30 minutes to do a full clean build. Not as pleasant, but usable.
I'm not sure what timings were considered acceptable for the other platforms (has anyone times a 4 core/ 4GB SPARC build recently?). But I'd suggest that the 8 core/8 GB config would be a useful suggested minimum.
- relates to
-
JDK-8179892 Update build documentation for JDK 9
-
- Resolved
-