I'm looking at the webrev in
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~roland/8154537/webrev.00/ and I see the
the changes were made to aarch64.ad but not to ad_aarch64.m4. This is
problematic because some .m4 files are used to generate the .ad file,
and if anyone regenerates the .ad file the bug will regress.
I think this is the change we need to make. It won't affect generated
code at all, but it is something of a ticking bomb.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aph/8185656.patch
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~roland/8154537/webrev.00/ and I see the
the changes were made to aarch64.ad but not to ad_aarch64.m4. This is
problematic because some .m4 files are used to generate the .ad file,
and if anyone regenerates the .ad file the bug will regress.
I think this is the change we need to make. It won't affect generated
code at all, but it is something of a ticking bomb.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aph/8185656.patch
- duplicates
-
JDK-8187224 aarch64: some inconsistency between aarch64_ad.m4 and aarch64.ad
- Closed
-
JDK-8187224 aarch64: some inconsistency between aarch64_ad.m4 and aarch64.ad
- Closed
- relates to
-
JDK-8154537 AArch64: some integer rotate instructions are never emitted
- Resolved