The handling of type annotations on the enclosing instance type of anonymous class supertypes is incorrect. Consider this example:

```
import java.lang.annotation.*;

class X {

    @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
    @Target(ElementType.TYPE_USE)
    public @interface TA {
        int value() default 0;
    }

    class Inner {}

    private void f() {
        class Local extends @TA(3) X.@TA(4) Inner {}
        new Local();
    }

    private void g() {
        new @TA(3) X.@TA(4) Inner() {};
    }
}
```

Of the type annotations on the local class' supertype, @TA(4) is on the inner type 'Inner' (with location=[INNER_TYPE]) and @TA(3) is on the enclosing instance X.

$ javap -v -p X\$1Local
...
class X$1Local extends X$Inner
...
RuntimeVisibleTypeAnnotations:
  0: #17(#18=I#19): CLASS_EXTENDS, type_index=65535, location=[INNER_TYPE]
    X$TA(
      value=4
    )
  1: #17(#18=I#20): CLASS_EXTENDS, type_index=65535
    X$TA(
      value=3
    )

On the anonymous class' synthetic declaration, the annotations on the supertype are incorrectly both placed on the inner type 'Inner' (with location=[INNER_TYPE]). @TA(3) should be on the enclosing instance instead with an empty `location=[]`, the same as for the local class.

$ javap -v -p X\$1
...
class X$1 extends X$Inner
...
RuntimeVisibleTypeAnnotations:
  0: #17(#18=I#19): CLASS_EXTENDS, type_index=65535, location=[INNER_TYPE]
    X$TA(
      value=4
    )
  1: #17(#18=I#20): CLASS_EXTENDS, type_index=65535, location=[INNER_TYPE]
    X$TA(
      value=3
    )