-
Enhancement
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
P4
-
11, 12
A DESCRIPTION OF THE PROBLEM :
Would it be possible to consider exposing SSLContextImpl#AbstractTrustManagerWrapper somehow so it would be possible to reuse it when a custom SSLEngine / SSLContextSpi is provided ?
I am asking because it provides really nice extra functionality by wrapping for X509TrustManager implementation and do extra hostname checks etc. At the moment we can not make use of this extra functionality in netty with our custom SSLEngine implementation as there is no way to access this. Which means depending on if the user use our implementation or the default implementation the behaviour if quite different when using a X509TrustManager in the sense that when using the default implementation a lot of extra checks are done.
As the extra checks done in AbstractTrustManagerWrapper is not really depending on the underlying SSLContextSpi implementation (at least as far as I was able to understand it so far) it would be nice to be able to make use of it.
Creating the issue as requested here:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2018-September/018249.html
Would it be possible to consider exposing SSLContextImpl#AbstractTrustManagerWrapper somehow so it would be possible to reuse it when a custom SSLEngine / SSLContextSpi is provided ?
I am asking because it provides really nice extra functionality by wrapping for X509TrustManager implementation and do extra hostname checks etc. At the moment we can not make use of this extra functionality in netty with our custom SSLEngine implementation as there is no way to access this. Which means depending on if the user use our implementation or the default implementation the behaviour if quite different when using a X509TrustManager in the sense that when using the default implementation a lot of extra checks are done.
As the extra checks done in AbstractTrustManagerWrapper is not really depending on the underlying SSLContextSpi implementation (at least as far as I was able to understand it so far) it would be nice to be able to make use of it.
Creating the issue as requested here:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2018-September/018249.html