Uploaded image for project: 'JDK'
  1. JDK
  2. JDK-8212895

ChronoField.INSTANT_SECONDS's range doesn't match the range of Instant

    XMLWordPrintable

Details

    • b19

    Description

      ADDITIONAL SYSTEM INFORMATION :
      OS - affects all
      Java - since 8 (introduction of java.time)

      A DESCRIPTION OF THE PROBLEM :
      Part of java.time is the inclusion of certain "meta" or framework-level types and helpers, for a variety of purposes. Of these, `java.time.temporal.ChronoField` includes a number of standard date-time fields with their expected ranges (encapsulated by a `ValueRange`, and returned by `range()`), like `MONTHS` (with a range of 1-12) and `DAYS_OF_YEAR` (with a range of 1-365/366).

      The range of `java.time.temporal.ChronoField.INSTANT_SECONDS`, however, doesn't match the valid, legal, range of `java.time.Instant`'s seconds field.
      The range given by `INSTANT_SECONDS` is from `Long.MIN_VALUE` (-9223372036854775808) to `Long.MAX_VALUE` (9223372036854775807)
      The range of valid seconds for an `Instant` is only from -31557014167219200 to 31556889864403199

      It is not possible to create an `Instant` outside its stated maximum/minimum - doing so throws an exception.


      STEPS TO FOLLOW TO REPRODUCE THE PROBLEM :
      Access the range of `java.time.temporal.ChronoField.INSTANT_SECONDS`

      EXPECTED VERSUS ACTUAL BEHAVIOR :
      EXPECTED -
      The `ValueRange` returned from `ChronoField.INSTANT_SECONDS` encodes the same range as is inherent in the type `Instant`.
      ACTUAL -
      The range is wildly different

      ---------- BEGIN SOURCE ----------
      package example;

      import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals;

      import org.junit.Test;

      import java.time.temporal.ChronoField;
      import java.time.Instant;

      /**
       * Unit test for simple App.
       */
      public class AppTest {
          /**
           * Rigorous Test :-)
           */
          @Test
          public void shouldMatch() {
              assertEquals(Instant.MIN.getLong(ChronoField.INSTANT_SECONDS),
                      ChronoField.INSTANT_SECONDS.range().getMinimum());
              assertEquals(Instant.MAX.getLong(ChronoField.INSTANT_SECONDS),
                      ChronoField.INSTANT_SECONDS.range().getMaximum());
          }
      }
      ---------- END SOURCE ----------

      CUSTOMER SUBMITTED WORKAROUND :
      None - the value is statically provided and cannot be overridden. However, due to how the library is meant to be used this is unlikely to be a large problem.

      FREQUENCY : always


      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Activity

            People

              jpai Jaikiran Pai
              webbuggrp Webbug Group
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              6 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: