javac correctly rejects the following type annotation on `One.Inner`, since annotations on `One` are not admissible (JLS 9.7.4).

```
import static java.lang.annotation.ElementType.TYPE_USE;

import java.lang.annotation.Target;

abstract class One {
  @Target(TYPE_USE)
  @interface A {}

  static class Inner {}

  @A One.Inner f;
}
```

One.java:11: error: scoping construct cannot be annotated with type-use annotation: @One.A
  @A One.Inner f;
        ^
1 error

However in this example the annotation has been modified to target both 'FIELD' and 'TYPE_USE' locations, and javac both emits the annotation as a declaration on the field, and as a type annotation on `One` (which is incorrect):

```
import static java.lang.annotation.ElementType.FIELD;
import static java.lang.annotation.ElementType.TYPE_USE;

import java.lang.annotation.Target;

abstract class Two {
  @Target({FIELD, TYPE_USE})
  @interface A {}

  static class Inner {}

  @A Two.Inner f;
}
```

  Two$Inner f;
    descriptor: LTwo$Inner;
    flags: (0x0000)
    RuntimeInvisibleAnnotations:
      0: #12()
        Two$A
    RuntimeInvisibleTypeAnnotations:
      0: #12(): FIELD
        Two$A

I think the compiler should reject both inputs.