-
Enhancement
-
Resolution: Not an Issue
-
P4
-
None
-
14
-
generic
-
generic
During the code review of:
JDK-8227338 templateInterpreter.cpp: copy_table() needs to be safer
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8227338
The possibility of making TemplateInterpreter::_active_table volatile
in order to limit C++ compiler optimizations was raised. This type
of change will ripple into the various functions that manage the
_active_table.
Coleen also wonders what needs to happen to the _active_table
logic when we eventually only have handshakes for safepoints.
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8227338
The possibility of making TemplateInterpreter::_active_table volatile
in order to limit C++ compiler optimizations was raised. This type
of change will ripple into the various functions that manage the
_active_table.
Coleen also wonders what needs to happen to the _active_table
logic when we eventually only have handshakes for safepoints.
- relates to
-
JDK-8227369 pd_disjoint_words_atomic() needs to be atomic
-
- Resolved
-
-
JDK-8227338 templateInterpreter.cpp: copy_table() needs to be safer
-
- Resolved
-