ARM32: Address displacement is 0 for volatile field access because of Unsafe field access.

XMLWordPrintable

    • b23
    • arm
    • generic

      (issue reported by christoph.goettschkes@microdoc.com)

      In the LIRGenerator::volatile_field_store() and LIRGenerator::volatile_field_load(), the target address is calculated by using the function add_large_constant(), which asserts that the given displacement is not 0. But in the implementation of the intrinsic for the Unsafe class, this can actually happen.

            Assignee:
            Boris Ulasevich
            Reporter:
            Boris Ulasevich
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: