• Icon: Sub-task Sub-task
    • Resolution: Won't Fix
    • Icon: P4 P4
    • tbd
    • 14
    • hotspot
    • None

      By adding a method in the CONFIG that skips that, for large tables freeing the table itself if it is large (65/128kb InternalTable) is rather slow (0.2ms+ - imagine having to release 1000's of those in a STW pause), probably a problem with malloc with large(r) blocks of memory though. I think table sizing heuristics could be tuned to keep the table size anyway.
      From current POV that will probably workarounded by moving deletion of the CHT into the concurrent phase.

            Unassigned Unassigned
            rehn Robbin Ehn
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: