Per this design discussion:
https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/amber-spec-experts/2020-May/002161.html
The consensus is that, at least until we revisit the topic, member classes of local/anonymous classes should not be allowed to use the 'sealed' modifier or to extend/implement a sealed class or interface.
javac should be updated accordingly.
https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/amber-spec-experts/2020-May/002161.html
The consensus is that, at least until we revisit the topic, member classes of local/anonymous classes should not be allowed to use the 'sealed' modifier or to extend/implement a sealed class or interface.
javac should be updated accordingly.
- relates to
-
JDK-8246775 JEP 397: Sealed Classes (Second Preview)
-
- Closed
-
-
JDK-8246379 Sealed Classes: Prohibit member classes of local/anonymous classes
-
- Resolved
-