-
Enhancement
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
P4
-
8-shenandoah, 11-shenandoah, 14, 15
-
b01
Issue | Fix Version | Assignee | Priority | Status | Resolution | Resolved In Build |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JDK-8247468 | 15.0.2 | Unassigned | P4 | Closed | Won't Fix | b01 |
JDK-8251069 | 15.0.1 | Aleksey Shipilev | P4 | Resolved | Fixed | b04 |
After JDK-8247310, we can just use the wait/notify on the newly introduced lock to coordinate wakeups of paced threads. This avoids doing exponential backoff that introduces additional latency.
- backported by
-
JDK-8251069 Shenandoah: pacer should wait on lock instead of exponential backoff
- Resolved
-
JDK-8247468 Shenandoah: pacer should wait on lock instead of exponential backoff
- Closed
- relates to
-
JDK-8247593 Shenandoah: should not block pacing reporters
- Resolved
-
JDK-8247310 Shenandoah: pacer should not affect interrupt status
- Closed