ADDITIONAL SYSTEM INFORMATION :
OpenJDK 11 and 14 allow to reproduce this bug, GraalVM does not.

A DESCRIPTION OF THE PROBLEM :
The first integer printed is not in the range specified by if-statement.

STEPS TO FOLLOW TO REPRODUCE THE PROBLEM :
Just run the main() method and check the output.

EXPECTED VERSUS ACTUAL BEHAVIOR :
EXPECTED -
#1 {integer in the range from 1000 to 9999 (both sides including)}
#2 {integer in the range from 1000 to 9999 (both sides including)}
ACTUAL -
#1 {integer NOT in the range from 1000 to 9999 (both sides including)}
#2 {integer in the range from 1000 to 9999 (both sides including)}

---------- BEGIN SOURCE ----------
public class Bug {
    /*
    * Why does this code output:
    * #1 1746077296
    * #2 9296
    * ???
    * */
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        for (int i = 0, j = 0; j < 2; i -= 1000) {
            if ((i > 999) && (i < 10000)) {
                j++;
                System.out.println("#" + j + ' ' + i + ' ' + Integer.MAX_VALUE);
            }
        }
    }
}
---------- END SOURCE ----------

CUSTOMER SUBMITTED WORKAROUND :
Use -XX:TieredStopAtLevel=3 option or make counter i and j volatile class fields.

FREQUENCY : always