As reported here:
https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/amber-spec-experts/2021-July/003049.html
Consider this case:
---
public class SwitchCoverage {
sealed interface A {}
sealed interface B1 extends A {}
sealed interface B2 extends A {}
sealed interface C extends A {}
final class D1 implements B1, C {}
final class D2 implements B2, C {}
void test(A arg) {
int i = switch (arg) {
case B1 b1 -> 1;
case B2 b2 -> 2;
};
}
}
---
The case should be considered exhaustive, but it is not.
https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/amber-spec-experts/2021-July/003049.html
Consider this case:
---
public class SwitchCoverage {
sealed interface A {}
sealed interface B1 extends A {}
sealed interface B2 extends A {}
sealed interface C extends A {}
final class D1 implements B1, C {}
final class D2 implements B2, C {}
void test(A arg) {
int i = switch (arg) {
case B1 b1 -> 1;
case B2 b2 -> 2;
};
}
}
---
The case should be considered exhaustive, but it is not.