-
Bug
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
P3
-
17.0.3, 18, 19, 20, 21
Issue | Fix Version | Assignee | Priority | Status | Resolution | Resolved In Build |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JDK-8299511 | 20 | Tobias Hartmann | P3 | Resolved | Fixed | b30 |
JDK-8299347 | na | Yi Yang | P3 | Closed | Not an Issue |
Arch: x86_64
OS: Ubuntu 20.04.4 LTS
HotSpot
- openjdk version "17.0.5-internal" 2022-10-18
- OpenJDK Runtime Environment (fastdebug build 17.0.5-internal+0-adhoc.simon.my-jdk17u)
- OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (fastdebug build 17.0.5-internal+0-adhoc.simon.my-jdk17u, mixed mode, sharing)
javac: javac 17.0.5-internal
A DESCRIPTION OF THE PROBLEM :
Note, this is found in OpenJDK 17.0.5 (internal; https://github.com/openjdk/jdk17u-dev; commit 041924ab).
The following is part of the log:
```
#
# A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment:
#
# Internal Error (/zdata/congli/my-jdk17u/src/hotspot/share/opto/memnode.cpp:226), pid=2320806, tid=2321039
# assert(phase->C->get_alias_index(t) == phase->C->get_alias_index(t_adr)) failed: correct memory chain
#
# JRE version: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (17.0.5) (fastdebug build 17.0.5-internal+0-adhoc.congli.my-jdk17u)
# Java VM: OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (fastdebug 17.0.5-internal+0-adhoc.congli.my-jdk17u, mixed mode, sharing, tiered, compressed oops, compressed class ptrs, g1 gc, linux-amd64)
# Problematic frame:
# V [libjvm.so+0x14393eb] MemNode::optimize_memory_chain(Node*, TypePtr const*, Node*, PhaseGVN*)+0x1ab
#
# No core dump will be written. Core dumps have been disabled. To enable core dumping, try "ulimit -c unlimited" before starting Java again
#
# If you would like to submit a bug report, please visit:
# https://bugreport.java.com/bugreport/crash.jsp
#
--------------- S U M M A R Y ------------
Command Line: -Xmx1G -Xbatch Test
Host: amdsuplus3.inf.ethz.ch, AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X 64-Core Processor, 128 cores, 251G, Ubuntu 20.04.4 LTS
Time: Thu Jun 9 18:31:10 2022 CEST elapsed time: 0.533573 seconds (0d 0h 0m 0s)
--------------- T H R E A D ---------------
Current thread (0x00007f93085e6e50): JavaThread "C2 CompilerThread0" daemon [_thread_in_native, id=2321039, stack(0x00007f92d33fc000,0x00007f92d34fd000)]
Current CompileTask:
C2: 533 53 % !b 4 Test::mainTest @ 152 (220 bytes)
Stack: [0x00007f92d33fc000,0x00007f92d34fd000], sp=0x00007f92d34f8300, free space=1008k
Native frames: (J=compiled Java code, j=interpreted, Vv=VM code, C=native code)
V [libjvm.so+0x14393eb] MemNode::optimize_memory_chain(Node*, TypePtr const*, Node*, PhaseGVN*)+0x1ab
V [libjvm.so+0x1440ed3] LoadNode::Ideal(PhaseGVN*, bool)+0x313
V [libjvm.so+0x1611818] PhaseIterGVN::transform_old(Node*)+0xb8
V [libjvm.so+0x160a6de] PhaseIterGVN::optimize()+0x7e
V [libjvm.so+0xa49319] Compile::Optimize()+0xa49
V [libjvm.so+0xa4b1b6] Compile::Compile(ciEnv*, ciMethod*, int, bool, bool, bool, bool, bool, DirectiveSet*)+0x1306
V [libjvm.so+0x873806] C2Compiler::compile_method(ciEnv*, ciMethod*, int, bool, DirectiveSet*)+0x646
V [libjvm.so+0xa5ce99] CompileBroker::invoke_compiler_on_method(CompileTask*)+0x1029
V [libjvm.so+0xa5dc88] CompileBroker::compiler_thread_loop()+0x678
V [libjvm.so+0x1a0b846] JavaThread::thread_main_inner()+0x266
V [libjvm.so+0x1a11a44] Thread::call_run()+0x104
V [libjvm.so+0x158987c] thread_native_entry(Thread*)+0x10c
```
STEPS TO FOLLOW TO REPRODUCE THE PROBLEM :
1. javac Test.java
2. java -Xbatch -Xmx1G Test
EXPECTED VERSUS ACTUAL BEHAVIOR :
EXPECTED -
No crashes
ACTUAL -
Crashed
---------- BEGIN SOURCE ----------
class Test {
int N;
double[] dArrFld;
int[] iArrFld;
int iMeth() {
double dArr[] = new double[N];
long meth_res = Double.doubleToLongBits(checkSum(dArr));
return (int) meth_res;
}
void mainTest(String[] strArr1) {
int i = 47864, i27 = 0, i32, i37 = 39;
short s4 = 21959;
float f4;
i ^= iMeth();
for (; ; ) {
for (i32 = 1; i32 < 46; i32++) i27 += s4;
do
for (f4 = 1; f4 < 1; ++f4) {
dArrFld[(int) f4] = 53586;
iArrFld[i37] *= 92.656F;
dArrFld = double1array(N, 2.89809);
}
while (++i37 < 46);
for (int ax$5 = 4; ax$5 < 6167; )
try {
long[] ax$3 = {1};
for (int ax$2 = 0; ax$2 < 100000; ) {
for (long duration : ax$3) {}
String ax$0 = "test";
ax$0 = ax$0 + ax$0;
ax$0 = ax$0 + ax$0;
}
} catch (Throwable ax$4) {
} finally {
}
}
}
public static void main(String[] strArr) {
Test _instance = new Test();
_instance.mainTest(strArr);
}
public static double checkSum(double[] a) {
double sum = 0;
for (int j = 0; j < a.length; j++) {
sum += (a[j] / (j + 1) + a[j] % (j + 1));
}
return sum;
}
public static double[] double1array(int sz, double seed) {
double[] ret = new double[sz];
init(ret, seed);
return ret;
}
public static void init(double[] a, double seed) {
for (int j = 0; j < a.length; j++) {
a[j] = (j % 2 == 0) ? seed + j : seed - j;
}
}
}
---------- END SOURCE ----------
FREQUENCY : always
- backported by
-
JDK-8299511 GVN Crash: assert() failed: correct memory chain
- Resolved
-
JDK-8299347 GVN Crash: assert() failed: correct memory chain
- Closed
- relates to
-
JDK-8303000 [lworld] C2 compilation fails with assert(phase->C->get_alias_index(t) == phase->C->get_alias_index(t_adr)) failed: correct memory chain
- Resolved
-
JDK-8267687 ModXNode::Ideal optimization is better than Parse::do_irem
- Resolved
- links to
-
Commit openjdk/jdk20/a6a903d4
-
Commit openjdk/jdk/04591595
-
Review openjdk/jdk20/80
-
Review openjdk/jdk/9777