Uploaded image for project: 'JDK'
  1. JDK
  2. JDK-8312158

"JNI local refs: 33, exceeds capacity: 32" in java.lang.ProcessHandleImpl$Info

XMLWordPrintable

    • generic
    • generic

      ADDITIONAL SYSTEM INFORMATION :
      macOS
      openjdk version "20.0.1" 2023-04-18
      OpenJDK Runtime Environment Temurin-20.0.1+9 (build 20.0.1+9)
      OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM Temurin-20.0.1+9 (build 20.0.1+9, mixed mode)


      A DESCRIPTION OF THE PROBLEM :
      When calling "ProcessHandle.current().info().command().orElse(null)" from a VM with -Xcheck:jni enabled, Java emits the following warnings:

      WARNING: JNI local refs: 33, exceeds capacity: 32
      at java.lang.ProcessHandleImpl$Info.info0(java.base@19.0.2/Native Method)
      at java.lang.ProcessHandleImpl$Info.info(java.base@19.0.2/ProcessHandleImpl.java:607)
      at java.lang.ProcessHandleImpl.info(java.base@19.0.2/ProcessHandleImpl.java:524)
      at ...

      This warning makes it difficult to use -Xcheck:jni as a validation step to find bugs in our own code.
       
      The bug does not occur with IBM Semeru, for example.


      STEPS TO FOLLOW TO REPRODUCE THE PROBLEM :
      Launch java with code that calls "ProcessHandle.current().info().command().orElse(null)", and has "-Xcheck:jni" enabled.

      EXPECTED VERSUS ACTUAL BEHAVIOR :
      EXPECTED -
      No warnings from Java SDK code

      ACTUAL -
      Several occurrences of

      WARNING: JNI local refs: 33, exceeds capacity: 32
      at java.lang.ProcessHandleImpl$Info.info0(java.base@19.0.2/Native Method)
      at java.lang.ProcessHandleImpl$Info.info(java.base@19.0.2/ProcessHandleImpl.java:607)
      at java.lang.ProcessHandleImpl.info(java.base@19.0.2/ProcessHandleImpl.java:524)
      at ...


      ---------- BEGIN SOURCE ----------
      ProcessHandle.current().info().command().orElse(null)
      ---------- END SOURCE ----------

      CUSTOMER SUBMITTED WORKAROUND :
      Use IBM Semeru

      FREQUENCY : always


            rriggs Roger Riggs
            webbuggrp Webbug Group
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            4 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: