Uploaded image for project: 'JDK'
  1. JDK
  2. JDK-8325993

Bump minimum JDK version for JavaFX to JDK 21

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: CSR CSR
    • Resolution: Approved
    • Icon: P3 P3
    • jfx23
    • javafx
    • None
    • behavioral
    • medium
    • A JavaFX application that has a dependency on another library that runs on JDK 17, but fails to run on JDK 21, will be unable to update to JavaFX 23.
    • Class file construct
    • JDK

      Summary

      Update the minimum version needed to run JavaFX to JDK 21.

      Problem

      In order for JavaFX to be able to use newer JDK features, such as code snippets (in API docs), record patterns, pattern matching for switch statements, and so forth, we need to increase the minimum version of the JDK that can run the latest JavaFX. Additionally, there is an ongoing cost to keeping JavaFX buildable and runnable on older versions of Java, and very little reason to continue to do so.

      Solution

      Use javac --release 21 to generate the class files that make up the JavaFX modules, except for the javafx.swing module where we will use -source 21 -target 21. The javafx.swing module requires the jdk.unsupported.desktop module, which is excluded by --release NN. Using -source 21 -target 21 is functionally equivalent, although it doesn't provide protection against accidentally using APIs that are present in the boot JDK with which we build JavaFX, but are unavailable in JDK 21. Care must be taken not to introduce a dependency on a too-new API by the javafx.swing module. As that module is unlikely to evolve, this is not much of a concern.

      Specification

      The class files in all JavaFX modules will be version 65.0 class files, meaning that they will only run on JDK 21 or newer.

      The following diffs will be applied to the JavaFX 23 release notes:

      -JavaFX 22 requires JDK 17 or later.
      +JavaFX 23 requires JDK 21 or later.

            kcr Kevin Rushforth
            kcr Kevin Rushforth
            Johan Vos
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: