This idea stems from discussion during 8035271.
With the PR for 8035271 it was found/discussed that `LineNumberTable` and `LocalVariableTable` may be displayed without any relevant context, when the `-l` flag is provieded without `-c`. Within the PR discussion it was proposed to add either an opcode count or code size to the output to provide further context.
Additional case for adding code size from the PR:
"this size is useful when people want their code to be below the FreqInlineSize".
These ideas should be further explored.
With the PR for 8035271 it was found/discussed that `LineNumberTable` and `LocalVariableTable` may be displayed without any relevant context, when the `-l` flag is provieded without `-c`. Within the PR discussion it was proposed to add either an opcode count or code size to the output to provide further context.
Additional case for adding code size from the PR:
"this size is useful when people want their code to be below the FreqInlineSize".
These ideas should be further explored.
- relates to
-
JDK-8035271 Incorrect indentation of LineNumberTable/LocalVariableTable/Exception table/LocalVariableTypeTable/StackMapTable/RuntimeVisibleTypeAnnotations in verbose mode
-
- Resolved
-