Following this discussion: https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/21782#discussion_r1906535686, similar changes, done by JDK-8330851, should also be done in GC TypeFunc creation.
Either we can follow the same change done for classes CallNode and ArrayCopyNode Or if we have a better and creative way to fix this then should try to do the same change for both of the classes (CallNode and ArrayCopyNode).
This is where I reverted GC related (some more) change: https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/21782/commits/8f1c527d79e88f51fcd576e976658f22bfba023e So maybe just do this patch again ?
Either we can follow the same change done for classes CallNode and ArrayCopyNode Or if we have a better and creative way to fix this then should try to do the same change for both of the classes (CallNode and ArrayCopyNode).
This is where I reverted GC related (some more) change: https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/21782/commits/8f1c527d79e88f51fcd576e976658f22bfba023e So maybe just do this patch again ?
- relates to
-
JDK-8330851 C2: More efficient TypeFunc creation
-
- Resolved
-
- links to
-
Review(master)
openjdk/jdk/27279