-
Bug
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
P2
-
21, 22, 23, 24, 25
Issue | Fix Version | Assignee | Priority | Status | Resolution | Resolved In Build |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JDK-8350318 | 24.0.2 | Martin Doerr | P2 | Resolved | Fixed | master |
JDK-8350339 | 24.0.1 | Nibedita Jena | P2 | Resolved | Fixed | b07 |
JDK-8349362 | 24 | Martin Doerr | P2 | Resolved | Fixed | b36 |
JDK-8349657 | 21.0.7 | Martin Doerr | P2 | Resolved | Fixed | b02 |
# A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment:
#
# SIGSEGV (0xb) at pc=0x00001000027ee234, pid=103220, tid=103252
#
# JRE version: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (25.0) (fastdebug build 25-internal-2025-01-23-1552158.rocastan.open)
# Java VM: OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (fastdebug 25-internal-2025-01-23-1552158.rocastan.open, mixed mode, tiered, compressed class ptrs, z gc, linux-ppc64le)
# Problematic frame:
# V [libjvm.so+0x1bde234] get_base_and_offset(MachNode const*, long&)+0x354
#
Stack trace (provided by [~mdoerr]):
V [libjvm.so+0xa1a3f0] TypePtr::offset() const+0x14 (type.hpp:994)
V [libjvm.so+0x1d35288] get_base_and_offset(MachNode const*, long&)+0xb0 (zBarrierSetC2.cpp:557)
V [libjvm.so+0x1d35818] is_allocation(Node const*)+0x108 (zBarrierSetC2.cpp:629)
V [libjvm.so+0x1d36230] ZBarrierSetC2::analyze_dominating_barriers() const+0x19c (zBarrierSetC2.cpp:759)
V [libjvm.so+0x1d33ea0] ZBarrierSetC2::late_barrier_analysis() const+0x54 (zBarrierSetC2.cpp:307)
V [libjvm.so+0x167d36c] PhaseOutput::perform_mach_node_analysis()+0x60 (output.cpp:258)
V [libjvm.so+0x167dc50] PhaseOutput::Output()+0x890 (output.cpp:346)
V [libjvm.so+0xa0a57c] Compile::Code_Gen()+0x4e4 (compile.cpp:3030)
V [libjvm.so+0x9fd51c] Compile::Compile(ciEnv*, ciMethod*, int, Options, DirectiveSet*)+0x179c (compile.cpp:884)
V [libjvm.so+0x80a220] C2Compiler::compile_method(ciEnv*, ciMethod*, int, bool, DirectiveSet*)+0x1f0 (c2compiler.cpp:141)
The crash has only been observed on PPC64, but there does not seem to be any fundamental reason (other than different addressing mode matching rules) that could prevent it from happening on other platforms.
Thanks to [~mdoerr] for the original bug report, see more context here: https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/23235.
- backported by
-
JDK-8349362 ZGC: segmentation fault due to missing node type check in barrier elision analysis
-
- Resolved
-
-
JDK-8349657 ZGC: segmentation fault due to missing node type check in barrier elision analysis
-
- Resolved
-
-
JDK-8350318 ZGC: segmentation fault due to missing node type check in barrier elision analysis
-
- Resolved
-
-
JDK-8350339 ZGC: segmentation fault due to missing node type check in barrier elision analysis
-
- Resolved
-
- blocks
-
JDK-8346280 C2: implement late barrier elision for G1
-
- Resolved
-
- relates to
-
JDK-8348656 [PPC64] Check effectiveness of C2 barrier elision
-
- Open
-
-
JDK-8307058 Implementation of Generational ZGC
-
- Resolved
-
- links to
-
Commit(jdk24) openjdk/jdk/b1659e34
-
Commit(master) openjdk/jdk21u-dev/46a14640
-
Commit(master) openjdk/jdk/afcc2b03
-
Review(jdk24) openjdk/jdk/23422
-
Review(master) openjdk/jdk21u-dev/1361
-
Review(master) openjdk/jdk24u/35
-
Review(master) openjdk/jdk/23295