A DESCRIPTION OF THE PROBLEM :
Seems like javac generates invalid RuntimeVisibleTypeAnnotations for a compact record constructor for the record with components annotated with type-use annotations, when component type is nested class.

STEPS TO FOLLOW TO REPRODUCE THE PROBLEM :
Compile the provided java source, then check byte code generated for `Outer.Inner.Id` constructor.


EXPECTED VERSUS ACTUAL BEHAVIOR :
EXPECTED -
Both parameters for Outer.Inner.Id constructor should have an annotation with `METHOD_FORMAL_PARAMETER` and `param_index` properties.
ACTUAL -
Below is the relevant part from the output of the JDK 25 `javap -v`
```
  public demo.RuntimeVisibleTypeAnnotationsOuter$Inner$Id(java.lang.String, demo.RuntimeVisibleTypeAnnotationsOuter$Id);
    descriptor: (Ljava/lang/String;Ldemo/RuntimeVisibleTypeAnnotationsOuter$Id;)V
    flags: (0x0001) ACC_PUBLIC
    Code:
      stack=2, locals=3, args_size=3
         0: aload_0
         1: invokespecial #1 // Method java/lang/Record."<init>":()V
         4: aload_0
         5: aload_1
         6: putfield #7 // Field value:Ljava/lang/String;
         9: aload_0
        10: aload_2
        11: putfield #13 // Field outerId:Ldemo/RuntimeVisibleTypeAnnotationsOuter$Id;
        14: return
      LineNumberTable:
        line 29: 0
        line 30: 14
      LocalVariableTable:
        Start Length Slot Name Signature
            0 15 0 this Ldemo/RuntimeVisibleTypeAnnotationsOuter$Inner$Id;
            0 15 1 value Ljava/lang/String;
            0 15 2 outerId Ldemo/RuntimeVisibleTypeAnnotationsOuter$Id;
    MethodParameters:
      Name Flags
      value mandated
      outerId mandated
    RuntimeVisibleTypeAnnotations:
      0: #30(): METHOD_FORMAL_PARAMETER, param_index=0
        demo.RuntimeVisibleTypeAnnotationsOuter$Anno
      1: #30(): FIELD
        demo.RuntimeVisibleTypeAnnotationsOuter$Anno
```

The first annotation is the expected annotation for the first parameter.
The second annotation unexpectedly targets `FIELD` without any additional properties.

Tried to compile with JDK 21, 24 and 25 - the same result with bogus second annotation.

---------- BEGIN SOURCE ----------
package demo;

import java.lang.annotation.ElementType;
import java.lang.annotation.Retention;
import java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy;
import java.lang.annotation.Target;

public record RuntimeVisibleTypeAnnotationsOuter(
    Id id
) {
    public RuntimeVisibleTypeAnnotationsOuter {
    }

    public record Id(
        String id
    ) {
    }

    public record Inner(
        Id id
    ) {
        public Inner {
        }

        public record Id(
            @Anno String value,
            RuntimeVisibleTypeAnnotationsOuter.@Anno Id outerId
        ) {
            public Id {
            }
        }
    }

    @Target(ElementType.TYPE_USE)
    @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
    public @interface Anno {
    }
}

---------- END SOURCE ----------