Consider use of "included" rather than "enclosed" in jx.a.p.Processor

XMLWordPrintable

    • Type: Enhancement
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Priority: P4
    • None
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Component/s: core-libs

      The use of "enclosed" in javax.annotation.processing.Processor looks to be using a more colloquial definition than the JLS-eque notion of "enclosed" used in parts of the javax.lang.model API.

      Alternative terminology, such as "included" used in RoundEnvironment for the concept in question should be considered.

            Assignee:
            Joe Darcy
            Reporter:
            Joe Darcy
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated: