-
Type:
Enhancement
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
Priority:
P4
-
None
-
Affects Version/s: 27
-
Component/s: infrastructure
Opening this on behalf of thomas@devoogdt.com
See:
https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/client-libs-dev/2025-November/033701.html
<quote>
I'm trying to compile OpenJDK in headless mode without the required X11 libraries. This becomes more common in embedded systems, where e.g. no head is used at all, or where e.g. only wayland is available.
For this, I proposed a patch in buildroot, see
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/buildroot/patch/20251115154030.1746780-1-thomas@devoogdt.com/
Buildroots policy is to upstream any custom patch when applicable, for which I created
https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/28310
</quote>
See:
https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/client-libs-dev/2025-November/033701.html
<quote>
I'm trying to compile OpenJDK in headless mode without the required X11 libraries. This becomes more common in embedded systems, where e.g. no head is used at all, or where e.g. only wayland is available.
For this, I proposed a patch in buildroot, see
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/buildroot/patch/20251115154030.1746780-1-thomas@devoogdt.com/
Buildroots policy is to upstream any custom patch when applicable, for which I created
https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/28310
</quote>
- relates to
-
JDK-8273258 Does the definition of RECT need to be from platform headers ?
-
- Open
-
-
JDK-8258465 Headless build fails due to missing X11 headers on linux
-
- Resolved
-
- links to
-
Review(master)
openjdk/jdk/28310