Name: vi73552 Date: 02/23/99


The problem is that the documentation of the classes of the default package are
not easely accessible. They appear in the index and in the class hierarchy, but
if you don't know the name of the class it is almost impossible to find them.

The default package does not appear in the package list. This is logical from a
certain point of view, since it is not a package, however it would be practical
to include it in order to know what classes are in the default package and have
access to their documentation in an easy way. It can be included in italics or
between brackets to make it clear that is not a "real" package.

I think it would be nice to have such a feature in 1.2 or any
later version of javadoc.
(Review ID: 43441)
======================================================================

Name: krT82822 Date: 05/30/99


Javadoc (a great tool) has good support for packages,
with the "PackageListFrame" etc. This is fine for everything
except classes that are in no packages, i.e. that are
in the "unnamed package". Those appear only in the complete
"class list", scattered among classes that are in packages.
This feature request is to add a way to include the
"unnamed" package in the package list, with an associated
list of classes that aren't in a package.
(Review ID: 83660)
======================================================================