-
Bug
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
P4
-
1.1.7, 1.2.0
-
beta2
-
generic, sparc
-
generic, solaris_2.6
-
Verified
When passing in source filenames (rather than package names) on the command
line, the generated web pages do not contain a list of packages, a package page,
or package.html. This request is to include this information, the same as if
the user had passed in a list of package names. Only the specified classes
would be documented with their own class pages -- unspecified classes would
not be documented.
For example, say class C belongs to package p, and C.java is passed in with
"javadoc C.java". Package p and class p.C would be documented.
Unspecified classes that belong to package p would remain undocumented.
(See the email trail in "Comments")
line, the generated web pages do not contain a list of packages, a package page,
or package.html. This request is to include this information, the same as if
the user had passed in a list of package names. Only the specified classes
would be documented with their own class pages -- unspecified classes would
not be documented.
For example, say class C belongs to package p, and C.java is passed in with
"javadoc C.java". Package p and class p.C would be documented.
Unspecified classes that belong to package p would remain undocumented.
(See the email trail in "Comments")
- duplicates
-
JDK-4213968 stddoclet: Want default (i.e. unnamed) package to appear in package list
-
- Closed
-
-
JDK-4162653 stddoclet: If given .java in different package dirs, should generate package doc
-
- Closed
-