Uploaded image for project: 'JDK'
  1. JDK
  2. JDK-8277090

jsr166 refresh for jdk19

    XMLWordPrintable

Details

    • Bug
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • P4
    • 19
    • 11.0.10-oracle
    • core-libs
    • None

    Description

      [Renamed from "ForkJoinPool initialization interferes with other static initialization", because the related changes can't be disentangled.]

      This CR mainly provides updates enabling planned loom and related jdk enhancements. The main goal is to streamline initialization by removing other JDK dependencies including VarHandles, and access control (currently only when deprecated SecurityManagers are not used; eventually further removable). It also includes performance improvements for async usages, as well as a few new methods (ForkJoinPool.lazySubmit and setParallelism) needed by other jdk enhancements. Also, to simplify upcoming integrations, it includes java.util.concurrent API updates in Future and ExecutorService that are introduced by loom, but do not directly involve VirtualThreads, and are independently useful.

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          csr for

          CSR - null JDK-8285450 jsr166 refresh for jdk19

          • P4 - Minor loss of function, or other problem where easy workaround is present.
          • Closed
          duplicates

          Enhancement - null JDK-8257781 Add ForkJoinTask.adaptInterruptible

          • P3 - Major loss of function.
          • Closed
          relates to

          Bug - A problem which impairs or prevents the functions of the product. JDK-8295962 Reference to State in Task.java is ambiguous when building with JDK 19

          • P2 - Crashes, loss of data, severe memory leak.
          • Resolved

          Bug - A problem which impairs or prevents the functions of the product. JDK-8301216 ForkJoinPool invokeAll() ignores timeout

          • P3 - Major loss of function.
          • Resolved

          Bug - A problem which impairs or prevents the functions of the product. JDK-8317960 [17u] Excessive CPU usage on AbstractQueuedSynchronized.isEnqueued

          • P4 - Minor loss of function, or other problem where easy workaround is present.
          • Resolved
          links to

          Commit Commit openjdk/jdk/00e6c63c

          Review Review openjdk/jdk/8490

          Review Review openjdk/jdk/8536

          Activity

            People

              dl Doug Lea
              dl Doug Lea
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              7 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: