Based on stack dump the test is still running:
{
"tid": "3",
"time": "2025-09-09T15:15:18.994366224Z",
"name": "main",
"state": "RUNNABLE",
"stack": [
"java.base\/java.io.FileOutputStream.writeBytes(Native Method)",
"java.base\/java.io.FileOutputStream.write(FileOutputStream.java:352)",
"java.base\/java.lang.System$Out.write(System.java:1910)",
"java.base\/java.io.BufferedOutputStream.flushBuffer(BufferedOutputStream.java:123)",
"java.base\/java.io.BufferedOutputStream.write(BufferedOutputStream.java:188)",
"java.base\/java.io.PrintStream.write(PrintStream.java:539)",
"java.base\/sun.nio.cs.StreamEncoder.writeBytes(StreamEncoder.java:220)",
"java.base\/sun.nio.cs.StreamEncoder.implFlushBuffer(StreamEncoder.java:315)",
"java.base\/sun.nio.cs.StreamEncoder.flushBuffer(StreamEncoder.java:101)",
"java.base\/java.io.OutputStreamWriter.flushBuffer(OutputStreamWriter.java:179)",
"java.base\/java.io.PrintStream.writeln(PrintStream.java:690)",
"java.base\/java.io.PrintStream.println(PrintStream.java:1027)",
"java.base\/java.lang.Throwable$WrappedPrintStream.println(Throwable.java:790)",
"java.base\/java.lang.Throwable.printStackTrace(Throwable.java:697)",
"java.base\/java.lang.Throwable.printStackTrace(Throwable.java:686)",
"java.base\/java.lang.Throwable.printStackTrace(Throwable.java:677)",
"jdk.hotspot.agent\/sun.jvm.hotspot.memory.CodeHeap.iterate(CodeHeap.java:120)",
"jdk.hotspot.agent\/sun.jvm.hotspot.code.CodeCache.iterate(CodeCache.java:132)",
"TestDebugInfoDecode.checkDecode(TestDebugInfoDecode.java:83)",
"TestDebugInfoDecode.main(TestDebugInfoDecode.java:117)"
],
so have to suspect the reduced timeout of 120s.
{
"tid": "3",
"time": "2025-09-09T15:15:18.994366224Z",
"name": "main",
"state": "RUNNABLE",
"stack": [
"java.base\/java.io.FileOutputStream.writeBytes(Native Method)",
"java.base\/java.io.FileOutputStream.write(FileOutputStream.java:352)",
"java.base\/java.lang.System$Out.write(System.java:1910)",
"java.base\/java.io.BufferedOutputStream.flushBuffer(BufferedOutputStream.java:123)",
"java.base\/java.io.BufferedOutputStream.write(BufferedOutputStream.java:188)",
"java.base\/java.io.PrintStream.write(PrintStream.java:539)",
"java.base\/sun.nio.cs.StreamEncoder.writeBytes(StreamEncoder.java:220)",
"java.base\/sun.nio.cs.StreamEncoder.implFlushBuffer(StreamEncoder.java:315)",
"java.base\/sun.nio.cs.StreamEncoder.flushBuffer(StreamEncoder.java:101)",
"java.base\/java.io.OutputStreamWriter.flushBuffer(OutputStreamWriter.java:179)",
"java.base\/java.io.PrintStream.writeln(PrintStream.java:690)",
"java.base\/java.io.PrintStream.println(PrintStream.java:1027)",
"java.base\/java.lang.Throwable$WrappedPrintStream.println(Throwable.java:790)",
"java.base\/java.lang.Throwable.printStackTrace(Throwable.java:697)",
"java.base\/java.lang.Throwable.printStackTrace(Throwable.java:686)",
"java.base\/java.lang.Throwable.printStackTrace(Throwable.java:677)",
"jdk.hotspot.agent\/sun.jvm.hotspot.memory.CodeHeap.iterate(CodeHeap.java:120)",
"jdk.hotspot.agent\/sun.jvm.hotspot.code.CodeCache.iterate(CodeCache.java:132)",
"TestDebugInfoDecode.checkDecode(TestDebugInfoDecode.java:83)",
"TestDebugInfoDecode.main(TestDebugInfoDecode.java:117)"
],
so have to suspect the reduced timeout of 120s.
- relates to
-
JDK-8260555 Change the default TIMEOUT_FACTOR from 4 to 1
-
- Resolved
-